Generally consistency results in intuitive design.
Each WindowFrame has a CloseButton, therefore to close the window (not hide), a close() call would be the logical choice rather than destroy.
What do you think? Perhaps close() could just be an alias for destroy()?
Search found 1 match
- Fri May 23, 2014 07:14
- Forum: Bug Reports, Suggestions, Feature Requests
- Topic: [Suggestion] WindowFrame destroy() should be close()?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3853