The Guru Myth

Forum for general chit-chat or off-topic discussion.

Moderators: CEGUI MVP, CEGUI Team

User avatar
CEGUI Project Lead
Posts: 6760
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 12:06
Location: England

The Guru Myth

Postby CrazyEddie » Mon Mar 14, 2011 11:38

Since we get quite a lot of posts asking for help but providing none of the context needed in order to provide any help, I thought it would be good to reproduce an article from the book "97 Things Every Programmer Should Know" published by O'Reilly. The article is "The Guru Myth" written by Ryan Brush and sums up the things people trying to help out on here experience on a regular basis.

Anyone who has worked in software long enough has heard questions like this:

    I'm getting exception XYZ. Do you know what the problem is?
Those asking the question rarely bother to include stack traces, error logs, or any context leading to the problem. They seem to think you operate on a different plane, that solutions appear to you without analysis based on evidence. They think you are a guru.

We expect such questions from those unfamiliar with software: To them systems can seem almost magical. What worries me is seeing this in the software community. Similar questions arise in program design, such as "I'm building inventory management. Should I use optimistic locking?" Ironically, people asking the question are often better equipped to answer it than the question's recipient. The questioners presumably know the context, know the requirements, and can read about the advantages and disadvantages of different strategies. Yet they expect you to give an intelligent answer without context. They expect magic.

It's time for the software industry to dispel this guru myth. "Gurus" are human. They apply logic and systematically analyze problems like the rest of us. They tap into mental shortcuts and intuition. Consider the best programmer you've ever met: At one point that person knew less about software than you do now. If someone seems like a guru, it's because of years dedicated to learning and refining thought processes. A "guru" is simply a smart person with relentless curiosity.

Of course, there remains a huge variance in natural aptitude. Many hackers out there are smarter, more knowledgeable, and more productive than I may ever be. Even so, debunking the guru myth has a positive impact. For instance, when working with someone smarter than me I am sure to do the legwork, to provide enough context so that person can efficiently apply his or her skills. Removing the guru myth also means removing a perceived barrier to improvement. Instead of a magical barrier, I see a continuum on which I can advance.

Finally, one of software's biggest obstacles is smart people who purposefully propagate the guru myth. This might be done out of ego, or as a strategy to increase one's value as perceived by a client or employer. Ironically, this attitude can make smart people less valuable, since they don't contribute to the growth of their peers. We don't need gurus. We need experts willing to develop other experts in their field. There is room for all of us.

By Ryan Brush

Reproduced under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3 license.

Myself, Kulik and the other people on here trying to help you are human just like you are. We are not super human, we are neither geniuses nor magicians; we are not gurus.

Posts: 812
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 23:59
Location: USA

Re: The Guru Myth

Postby Jamarr » Tue Mar 15, 2011 23:57

Wisdom. :pint:
If somebody helps you by replying to your thread, upvote him/her as a thanks! Make sure to include your CEGUI.log and everything you tried when posting! And remember that we are not magicians!

User avatar
Just can't stay away
Just can't stay away
Posts: 136
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 14:18
Location: Holbaek, Denmark

Re: The Guru Myth

Postby jacmoe » Sun Mar 20, 2011 18:29

I can't agree more! :hammer:

Just popping in
Just popping in
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 20:34

Re: The Guru Myth

Postby ERSmith » Mon Mar 28, 2011 16:42

This is so true. It applies across all the computer spectrum, too.

I am an official computer scientist. My current job has no IT people so it is assumed that because I am a computer scientist I must also know about everything to do with their own PC. Why their web apps don't work etc. etc.

It turns out I can make good guesses, but in the end, like the article above, they are just educated guesses.

Return to “Offtopic Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest