[Suggestion] WindowFrame destroy() should be close()?
Posted: Fri May 23, 2014 07:14
Generally consistency results in intuitive design.
Each WindowFrame has a CloseButton, therefore to close the window (not hide), a close() call would be the logical choice rather than destroy.
What do you think? Perhaps close() could just be an alias for destroy()?
Each WindowFrame has a CloseButton, therefore to close the window (not hide), a close() call would be the logical choice rather than destroy.
What do you think? Perhaps close() could just be an alias for destroy()?